Annual report 2001




Disciplinary liability of students, disciplinary measures

The behaviour of students in breach of their obligations may entail various legal consequences. In the case of students breaching their obligations severely and delinquently, disciplinary proceedings should be launched. If the action of a student does not attain the level necessitating the launching of disciplinary proceedings, then it may lead to the application of disciplinary measures. Disciplinary proceedings are regulated in detail by law, the forms and principles of application of disciplining measures must be included in the organisational and operating regulations of the school or dormitory hostel.
We were contacted on several occasions protesting the conduct of disciplinary proceedings.

A parent protested against the course of disciplinary proceedings brought against their child and the manner of notification on the disciplinary proceedings. The applicant reported that the official notification sent by the school specified December 7th as the date for the hearing. However, the disciplinary hearing was held on November 30th without their knowledge and presence. Pursuant to the Act on Public Education, the parent of a minor student must be invited to the disciplinary hearing. In the absence of a proper notification of the parent, no disciplinary hearing may be held. With a view to the above, we approached the head of institution with an initiative to conduct disciplinary proceedings in compliance with legislation in the future, since the particular pupil was not a student of the school anymore at the time. The principal accepted this initiative. (K-OJOG-50/2001)
A parent contacted our Office to protest against the course of a disciplinary hearing conducted against their child. We established that the head of the institution was present during the hearing legally since the hearing was in no way closed. However, the principal - who was not a member of the disciplinary panel acted unlawfully when they disturbed the course of the hearing with their remarks, and thus jeopardised the impartial decision-making of the panel. Since in the course of the disciplinary proceedings a decision was reached on terminating the proceedings, we did not identify any initiative with a view to the lesser significance of the infringement of rights. We, however, informed the principal on the rules of disciplinary proceedings in order to prevent any infringement of the provisions governing disciplinary hearings in the future. (K-OJOG-332/2001)

When examining the applications related to disciplining measures, we established the infringement of educational rights on several counts. It is important that these measures may be applied to sanction breaches of obligations related to the student legal relationship.

A teacher inquired as to whether a disciplinary warning may be applied as a sanction by the school for the inappropriate behaviour of a student at a football match. We informed the teacher that if the district football match had not been a school event, then the application of any sanction by the school would violate the law. (K-OJOG-569/2001)

Disciplining measures must be enumerated and the principles of their application must be set forth in the pedagogical operational regulations of the educational institution. The mere fact of the inclusion of a measure in the organisational and operating regulations does not render its application legal. The organisational and operating regulations may not contain disciplinary measures infringing educational rights as a consequence of the behaviour of students in breach of their obligations. We have already mentioned the illegality of sending a student out from the class as a disciplinary measure which was included in pedagogical operational regulations. (Case K-OJOG-227/2001 in the Chapter on Absences)
We were contacted many times with protests at the illegality of measures by teachers or schools for disciplining purposes. We concluded that sending a student home may not be applied as a disciplining measure.

A parent protested that their son was sent home from a class by one of his teachers because of his misconduct. In the particular case, we established the infringement of educational rights since the student was sent home from the school when he was under the supervision of the school according to a statutory provision. Therefore we approached the principal with an initiative to take the necessary measures to prevent a similar incident happening in the school in the future and to ensure, in compliance with the statutory requirements, the supervision of students entrusted to him. The principal accepted our initiative. (K-OJOG-137/2001)

In several of our cases the refusal to hand over students' school certificates was used as a disciplinary measure by the school. It was clearly established in these cases that the institution acted illegally when refusing to deliver the certificate to the student at the time of handing out the certificates. With a view to the above, we approached the head of the institution with an initiative for the school to refrain from refusing to hand out school certificates for any reason. Our initiative was accepted in all cases. (K-OJOG-296/2001, K-OJOG-299/2001, K-OJOG-337/2001.

previous
next
Top

  OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER FOR EDUCATIONAL RIGHTS
  1055 - Budapest, Szalay u. 10-14.; e-mail: panasz@oktbiztos.hu

Impresszum  
Főoldal